That door ajar, the minimum required to see to make them available to others, but not all, to retire when you feel" invaded "when you are intoxicated approval from harmful smoke that makes us" victims and witnesses of cultural mourning "(Pasolini). The intimate sphere can not contain the "social life" in its entirety. I understood that. The "women", "friends", the "children", the "students", the "parents", the "comrades", fill my life, but not all come within, indeed, almost all remain outside the 'door, next to intimacy, waiting, perhaps, but outside. It is shortsighted exclusion is slow to come to light as an appearance that dies. Those who approach the door, are enriching interfaces, pleasing, copies of my personality, precious expressions of dignity, tenderness, devotion, knowledge and know-how, charming gestures of piety. The threshold to cross, however, is a decisive step, not by all, which only makes the person, because not preceded, accompanied or followed by a more ardent, arrogant "love" of that type. With the passing of years, I have discovered that traces the intimate involvement of intense, almost a humus of a flourishing garden. An emotional inclination to preference. The rarity of appearances in the room which houses a few close friends, does not refer at all to dryness of mind, but the ability to understand the "value" of the other and make themselves known so genuine and disinterested because "love does not boil the pot. " Here, the intimate attendance, moves away from the incessant flow of reports while significant, challenging or important in itself, that mark the human experience. The peculiar nature of intimate shows itself also in its phenomenology lies in the "common sentiment," a primordial datum essential to make sure that the relationship can flourish and grow, all "deal." Neither belief nor shared rationality, nor the similar practice can be the "common feeling" that resides in the exclusive area granted and won together. Membership I describe is not "that stupid, vulgar, vulgar that governs our present and turns every day into hypocrisy arrogance, corporatism "(from" The Courage to belong only to themselves "by E. D'Errico, Corriere della Sera, Thursday, December 9, 2010, p. 53).. I think that even alludes to this dimension of exclusivity in a heretical form of radical life choice - in any "choice" is liberty - substantially departs the forced social gathering at which, willy-nilly, we are all induced by volcanically that rhythm of life, from that inner fire that is fueled by rare human fuel. The ideals, values, moral approach, but almost never make one that is dual, separate. By contrast, the fusion occurs in the space bounded by the desire to be "real" because you have not spontaneously or "socially." This aura of "truth" (the plural, of course) takes us in that we cross paths, community solidarity, collective responsibility that we take in, so as to always be "different", to speak a language "other" - it is good that someone become resigned - will never be easily decoded, never quite comparable, if not forward in the difficult path of intimacy sought. Tend to close, this is what is on the generality of the relations established during the series although the existential; Another is "enter" the hidden, private room.

0 comments:
Post a Comment