PALAGIANELLO 9 MONTHS OF DIRECTORS AND ALL WE ARE BACK! 's been 9 months of setting up the administration, although there to say that there come in those who administer the last 5 years and who since 2006, what was done to help this community? I believe in Palagianello operating in counter and we return all the reasons are obvious and you do a few examples: we are returning a subordinate country looked just like other common carrier of votes, so the freight yard when he was alleged to Labalestra minority, now will not happen more Palagianello but rather to "cave Lupara" and our mayor does not spend a single word to make sure that this work is implemented in our community has indeed signed an agreement with the Mayors of Castellaneta and where to Laterza jointly agreed that the goods yard will take place in Cave shotgun. Another example is the unlawful, illegal building, the reckless approved and facilitated by administrators that allow an individual to build on a public road. Another example which shows that our country has come back is the environment. The Natural Park has been destroyed and abandoned, and instead of intervening with minor surgery, so all you have left without even providing for the restoration of the lamps, the parking of caravans has become a field of dry grass and also destroyed and left to itself, the municipal swimming pool, where we recall that the city has won the case with the managers and nobody talks about it, and also in a state of neglect, the country is increasingly dirty and rightly ecological operators alone can not clean up around the country including remote areas, (since I'm still working part-time and full-time as promised during the campaign), then the mayor and his council expects it to take off his tie and suit to get in to clean the country as we did? And the more we say that we are ready to participate in this event but he should be ahead of us. While the thing that highlights the disregard of the environment is not the abandonment of separate collection systems door to door to go to the waste collection bins. In addition, the mayor
must explain to people why the c / c on 28/06/07 when the junta Petrera / Borracci / Christmas / D 'Alo / Caspar brought the change of collection systems, proposing the return of the bins, very similar to its project In its explanation of vote, noting that he was adviser to the minority, the majority invited to open a table in consultation with the minority and asked them to be heard above the public schools, parties etc.. and his vote was contrary to the system with separate collection bins. And what they have to say about him, and Todisco, who published that article on the courier of the day when they were the minority where they say that the proposal made by the separate collection Giunta abnormal Petrera was just to spite Rubino purchase of the compactor and bins were only unnecessary expenses paid by the citizens? Why today by Mayor has implemented this system? What has changed? And 'the effect of power? are old friends who were with Petrera and today are with him? or he is just a continuation of the abnormal Board of which perhaps was a bit 'part? In addition, they are not respecting the lines driving the car which provide all the steps with the institutions, citizens, unions, political parties etc..
should be clarified another aspect of a good director sometimes has to make choices against the unpopular and for the good of the community, so Ruby decided in 2003 in anticipation time to introduce the system of waste collection door to door "that brought many benefits to our community by the ISO 14001 certificate to award common riciclone of Italy as well as various economic incentives received by the Region. We set an example for other municipalities to Melpignano and today, from 78% of money to candidates to pay the Eco-tax. In addition, the administration had Ruby and there was no opposition to composting centers in the area beyond that of the Minister Ginosa Lease then President of the Region had to close.
Today everyone is talking about recycling, maintaining that the only valid system to arrive at percentages Law is the system door to door and did not tell us, says PeaceLink, Greenpeace, says Beppe Grillo Berlusconi says even Palagianello only with a system already started to improve and certainly the majority decides to go back. For this I ask the President to the Regional Vendola Losappio in an interview with Corriere Day of September 2, 2008 warned the ATO and the Community, which did not make the collection, the Commissioner would have been common, dear Lord, we do not Palagiano us or we were common riciclone Castellaneta of Italy in 2003 and today is back to worrying proportions and bins then this must be common as we believe that the police should be the entire police Ato / 1 because it is unacceptable that the president is mayor of a town where not only do not we recycle but there is a dump with incinerator.
I believe that we citizens must be guided by a single thought regarding the collection, leaving aside the ideologies and beliefs, but by asking a single question who benefits with the collection and who benefits with the bins.
We believe that diversifying the city makes money and the environment, in economic terms the benefits of recycling common regional incentives and rebates on the tax so it can make the TARSU, recycling does not run the risk of nell'ecotassa, farmers Palagianello and traders can now boast an advantage in the market thanks to the ISO 14001 certificate, which was obtained thanks to the system of door to door collection, continuing our community such a system could save € 325mila spent unnecessarily on the purchase of bins and the compactor, which by law bearing on the cost and time burdens on citizens, in addition to those costs plus the cost of washing containers because they will not even wash them? dirty water capacity of containers will be disposed of in landfills because it is forbidden dispose of in the sewer and then additional costs for citizens. Not to mention the damage to environment and health because the bins get dirty, attract insects, emit foul odors, and the material is compacted and thrown in the bins ends up in landfill, and then disposed of in incinerators, and I'd be very careful to not mix up the words because the politicians are good at changing the words For example, incinerator, biogas, biodiesel, biomass, positive words with prefixes such as ECO and BIO often used to hide the old disposal systems because there is nothing to exploit, everything is incinerated and waste burning in the air free of nano powders they do not stop in the lungs but can reach the blood in 60 seconds and all the organs in one hour causing cancer. Thanks to this tactic our politicians have allowed 7% of the total bill for electricity or the famous ecoincentivi Cip6 instead of going to renewable resources have added the amendment that is the magic word here is similar and renewable funding to monezzari for incinerators. And while in Europe have become a waste material to be collected with care and try to get products to market at affordable prices in Italy administrators argue that the cycle of waste incineration and should be closed with the Italian Federation of General Practitioners maintains that the incineration of waste is the disposal route more harmful to the environment and health. So to make money with the containers are monezzari and friends of monnezzari. If permit is not the country I wanted, I dream of a municipality with a 5-star energy plan that looks forward to renewable energies such as wind and photovoltaics, which sensitize people to waste less water, and educate the recovery and reuse of 'water, which cures the environment and health of citizens, who face the waste collection door to door and going towards the zero waste strategy, which has a sustainable mobility.
But unfortunately we have to do with Palagianello administrators affected by the syndrome lack credibility pinocchio and I'll explain why: the electoral program of bins but did not speak of ecological islands, and then they made fun of people, in a public meeting the Mayor stated that the draft prepared by Petrera public lighting was not right because he jumped Piazza Roma citizens and promised an illuminated square on duty! Another hoax! Had promised to clarify the responsibilities of the accident at the castle Stella Caracciolo which cost the life of a worker but after months and after asking a municipal council has not yet convened by the chairman of the board, we have no information . And again on December 31 stated in a press conference that the rate of collection was increased from 12% to 21% with the application of other bins buffalo! Since the site of the Puglia region shows that we free fall from 12 to 10%. Not to mention the 1000 election and lies of the many jobs promised, today we are discussing more of the youth question, dear administrators thank you for the votes and healthy is the important place friends and I want to say that this young country is no longer able to guarantee anything, work, family, retirement severance pay, political representation and then we can understand that the youth question can not be solved alone or with the pleasure and knowledge and putting it all together we wake up struggling to take back future or should we resign ourselves and not worry so much more for the future because we will not. City Councilman Vito
Vetrano
